Re: "A General Theory of Love" <- great book and theory

From: John Regehr (
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 22:16:18 PST

> It doesn't mention 'bicameral mind' anywhere (according to the index and my
> memory). It seems somewhat orthogonal to me currently. See my next post.

Why would it mention Jaynes' stuff? I was under the impression that it
has been pretty thoroughly discredited. I could be wrong, though - I
just remember talking about it with some psychologists at some point.

A good book about the mind is Pinker's _How the Mind Works_. Lots of
good evolutionary psychology explanations for things. For whatever
reason, these often ring true for me.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:18:02 PDT