In a message dated 1/26/01 7:50:59 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org writes:
>First we have an argument against cycles, and then a
>phrase which seems to resurrect them.
the thinking's consistent, just not the metaphors. For cycles read "bumpy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:17:52 PDT