So there's zecious then there's just premature "send."
> That's pure semantics *and* intentionally misleading. You're implying that *any*
> tax system which allows the highest wealth class to accumulate wealth tax-free is
> regressive; a regressive *income tax* scheme only applies to
*income.* Income taxes are only a part of the tax burden we all bear.
> > Can someone azeciously defend A?
> Well, I've done what I'm willing to do. You can go ahead and pat yourself on the
> back for a righteous defense and maintenance of the massive denial that you're
> engaging in that allows you to believe that our tax systems confiscate most of your
> economic output in one way or another.
That is to say, *do not* confiscate....
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 23:14:48 PDT