# Transaction tax equations REVISED... Re: So .. how does a transaction tax stack up?

From: Jeff Bone (jbone@jump.net)
Date: Mon Apr 02 2001 - 13:42:19 PDT

Punchline up front: I was sloppy. It's equitable. The math was
sound, but I plugged the wrong numbers. Kudos to Russell for keeping
me honest.

TRANSACTION TAX SYSTEM

W = E - C - T(I+C) (Eq. 1)

EQUITABLE-3

Definition 2: (D2) An EQUITABLE-3 tax system is one where,
given two parties x, y such that Ex > Ey, independent of the
absolute allocations of earnings between consumption,
savings, or investment but assuming that the individual
ratios of these components over earnings are equal:

for x, y such that Ex > Ey:
Cx/Ex = Cy/Ey & Ix/Ex = Iy/Ey & Sx/Ex = Sy/Sy ---> Wxy =
Pxy

THEOREM: A flat universal transaction tax is EQUITABLE-3

Given:

W = E - C - T(I+C) (Eq. 1)
Wxy = Wx / Wy (Eq. 2)
Pxy = Ex / Ey (Eq. 3)

Er = 10 (Ritchie earns \$10) (G1)
Ej = 2 (Joe earns \$2) (G2)
Cr = 5, Ir = 2.5, Sr = 2.5 (G3)
Cj = 1, Ij = .5, Sj = .5 (G4)
Cr / Er = Cj / Ej etc. (satisfying D2)
T = .5 (50%, or whatever...) (G5)

Analysis:

Wr = 10 - 5 - .5(2.5 + 5) = 1.25 (A1, from Eq. 1, G1, G3, G5)
Wj = 2 - 1 - .5(.5+1) = .25 (A2, from Eq. 1, G2, G4, G5)
Wrj = Wr / Wj = 1.25 / .25 = 5 (A3, from Eq 2, A1, A2)

Prj = 10 / 2 = 5 (A4, from Eq. 3, G1, G2)

5 = 5, Wrj = Prj (A3, A4)
D1 is TRUE

.: A flat universal transaction tax is EQUITABLE-3.

DISCUSSION

Grr...

jb

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 20:25:25 PDT