RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD

From: Lucas Gonze (lucas@worldos.com)
Date: Mon Apr 16 2001 - 09:40:05 PDT

Next message: Wayne E Baisley: "Re: CS rant du jour"
Previous message: Rodent of Unusual Size: "Re: CS rant du jour"
In reply to: Mike Dierken: "RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD"
Next in thread: Dhiren Patel: "RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD"
Reply: Dhiren Patel: "RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Cringely is an analyst, not a scientist. Whether he lied or not about
being a professor at Stanford doesn't have much impact on whether you find
his insights useful.

- Lucas

   Do you have links for reference? I'd like some objective info before my
credibility-o-meter gets set.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Dhiren Patel [mailto:dlists@dhiren.com]
    Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:08 PM
    To: Karl Anderson; fork@xent.ics.uci.edu
    Subject: Re: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD

Isn't this the same dude who lied about being a professor at Stanford?
Pretty low on the credibility-o-meter, IHMO.

Dhiren

At 11:34 AM 4/13/2001 -0700, Karl Anderson wrote:

I found the latest Pulpit to be pretty annoying.

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20010412.html

Next message: Wayne E Baisley: "Re: CS rant du jour"
Previous message: Rodent of Unusual Size: "Re: CS rant du jour"
In reply to: Mike Dierken: "RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD"
Next in thread: Dhiren Patel: "RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD"
Reply: Dhiren Patel: "RE: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 20:25:48 PDT