Cringely is an analyst, not a scientist. Whether he lied or not about
being a professor at Stanford doesn't have much impact on whether you find
his insights useful.
Do you have links for reference? I'd like some objective info before my
credibility-o-meter gets set.
From: Dhiren Patel [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:08 PM
To: Karl Anderson; email@example.com
Subject: Re: Cringely adds to the XML antiFUD
Isn't this the same dude who lied about being a professor at Stanford?
Pretty low on the credibility-o-meter, IHMO.
At 11:34 AM 4/13/2001 -0700, Karl Anderson wrote:
I found the latest Pulpit to be pretty annoying.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 29 2001 - 20:25:48 PDT