From: David Crook (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed May 16 2001 - 10:05:03 PDT
At 02:01 PM 5/14/01 -0400, Tom wrote:
>On Mon, 14 May 2001, David Crook wrote:
>--]What is with this fascination of granting the status of "Human" to
>--]of cells in various degrees of development. I'm personally not even
>--]willing to grant it to most of the "people" that I see on the news,
>--]the springer show.
>So whats your final solution? Is it somethign like Retroactive abortion?
>If the fetus is not a viable human by age 18 it can be taken out?
>This would solve a lot of problems. Kids ....you feed it , you house it,
>you cloth it. Its not like its surviving on its own. So up till they are
>emancipated why not have the choice to end its exisitence.
>Loud music, sassing, reading bizzare manifestos, multiple hair
>colorings...I mean enoughs enough. OUt they go.
>You can take it down to the local Federal run Head Partings facility and
>put it on the table and buzz saw device.
>One less collection of cells to annoy you.
Nahh, no need to abort them. But do they really need to vote?
The loud hairdoos and piercings are fine. I'm planning on giving my son
the manifestos when he gets older. I'm thinking that "The Prince" would
make a wonderful birthday gift. Every child should have a copy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 17 2001 - 15:08:41 PDT