RE: [FoRK] Rumours of L.Wood's Death have been greatly exaggerated.

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Carey Lening (carey@tstonramp.com)
Date: Mon May 22 2000 - 11:28:55 PDT


It just seems bitter to me.. .but thats me. Cynicism will get you every time.

At 11:46 AM 5/21/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Lloyd,
>
>It sounds like you just want to take your ball
>(or all of them) and go home. That's not in the
>spirit of having a post or maybe two removed
>to protect privacy. Removing all your posts
>would remove the context of all replies to
>your posts, and replies to those replies...
>
>Maybe I should back up and say, what did I miss?
>Why, Lloyd, do you want all your posts removed?
>Given the nature of this list, it's a rather
>unusual request.
>
>- Joe
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Whitehead [mailto:ejw@ics.uci.edu]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 11:27 AM
> > To: L.Wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk; FoRK-noarchive@xent.com
> > Subject: RE: [Elwood] Rumours of FoRK's Death have been greatly
> > exaggerated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > | There's nothing wrong at all with anyone exercising
> > their right to
> > > | privacy, even having me remove a post from the archive.
> > It's only a
> > > | social experiment to see how open people will be on the record.
> > >
> > > Well, there you go. I wish to exercise that right. Right now.
> >
> > I too think the archives should not be touched, except in the
> > case of a
> > court order, or to avoid a lawsuit.
> >
> > - Jim
> >
> >
> >


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 22 2000 - 16:32:48 PDT