From: Damien Morton (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Jul 28 2000 - 19:02:30 PDT
So what if a machine reboots once in a while, with clustering you just dont
care - it means a 10% hit on performance until the machine reboots.
Comparing uptime is like comparing dick size. Nice to have, but easy to
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavin Thomas Nicol [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 9:44 PM
> To: FoRK
> Subject: RE: FW: Kill the RIAA: a protocol
> > Undoubtedly, NT is more stable than 95/98. Ran NT for dev boxes,
> > servers up at the office for years; it got better over time, but still
> > the uptime I was used to from old SunOS / BSD boxes.
> Most NT boxes in high-end (> 2,500,000 hits per server per day) I've seen,
> simply didn't stay up for more than a few days, despite *lot's* of work.
> Sun boxes, once configured, don't crash nearly as often.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jul 28 2000 - 19:15:04 PDT