Re: Why is RDF hard?

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Dave Winer (
Date: Tue Aug 15 2000 - 12:01:24 PDT

You want two RSS 1.0s?

Don't you think that would be a bit confusing?

I don't take the "proposal" part too seriously, neither should you. Other
people are dropping the word, on the mail list you point to and elsewhere.

One of the things I like about FoRK list is that we don't have to pretend we
were born yesterday.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Edd Dumbill" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: Why is RDF hard?

> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 11:31:34AM -0700, Dave Winer wrote:
> > Edd, I chose to discuss this on FoRK because I consider it neutral. I
> > want to in any way interfere with the RDF folk going forward, and I
> > want to join their group. I am busy, and don't believe in what they're
> > doing. I would also appreciate a response to this question. Where do we
> > from here? How do you expect me to continue to work in RSS, or do you?
> > so, state it clearly, so everyone else can see how you process this
> If you don't like the proposal for a new RSS 1.0, make an alternative
> one, or stick with using RSS 0.91 as it is now: the conversion is easy.
> -- Edd

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 15 2000 - 12:10:08 PDT