From: Gordon Mohr (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Aug 16 2000 - 17:14:43 PDT
Jeff Bone writes:
> Let's brush aside all the inflationary concerns,
> etc., by saying only the first person on this list to do so is allowed to turn
> themselves magically into a billionaire; and let's posit that there's no
> downside or negative effect to anyone else in doing this. (Aside from some other
> FoRKers being pretty pissed that you beat them to it.)
> Who here wouldn't rush to be the first person to do that?
A problem with this experiment is that, as constructed, it only shows
that most people like "magical free money". Real money, especially *big*
money, takes sacrifices to acquire, and this experiment can't shed light
on money's relative value compared to other things.
Would you take a billion dollars, if it meant you could never again visit
your home country? You could never again visit your favorite places; in
order to see your local friends, they'd have to travel abroad to meet you.
I think lots of people would turn down that billion.
And yet, taking even the "magic free billion" could be a lot like
that, if you kept it and people knew you'd received it. Noone would
ever treat you the same again; it could be like being in a foreign
country the rest of your life. If your aspirations in life included
recognized accomplishment in the arts, sciences, business or poltics/
social service, you might get recognition -- but people would always
suspect it was because of the magic billion, not because of "you".
So I do think some people would prefer to avoid the taint of the
billion, either by ignoring it or taking it and then very publically
giving it all away.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 16 2000 - 17:20:13 PDT