From: John Regehr (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 22:16:18 PST
> It doesn't mention 'bicameral mind' anywhere (according to the index and my
> memory). It seems somewhat orthogonal to me currently. See my next post.
Why would it mention Jaynes' stuff? I was under the impression that it
has been pretty thoroughly discredited. I could be wrong, though - I
just remember talking about it with some psychologists at some point.
A good book about the mind is Pinker's _How the Mind Works_. Lots of
good evolutionary psychology explanations for things. For whatever
reason, these often ring true for me.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 04 2001 - 22:22:19 PST