Re: greenspan (and more media bias)

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: John Regehr (
Date: Mon Jan 29 2001 - 14:42:18 PST

> The issue of how federal tax dollars are spent is the essence of the
> 'conservative vs liberal' debate imho. And three of the above 'news sources'
> choose to completely ignore Greenspan's comments on spending programs. That's
> bias plain and simple. This sort of one sided press coverage has been going on
> for years in the gun control debate.

Speaking of the gun debate and media bias, here's a good example. This
is from a mail by David Friedman ( on the Armchair
Economist mailing list the other day:

  A similar story involved one of the school shootings--I think in
  Mississippi. A vice principal owned a handgun, had a concealed carry
  permit, and had routinely carried his firearm on campus--until the
  Federal safe schools act made doing so illegal. Thereafter he left
  the handgun in his car trunk and parked a quarter mile from
  school--since the act forbids firearms within a thousand feet of a

  When the shooting occurred he ran to his car, got the firearm, ran
  back, and used the firearm to force the student who was doing the
  shooting to surrender. A few of the news stories mentioned his action
  and the fact that he used a firearm. The overwhelming majority either
  ignored him or reported his persuading the student to stop shooting
  without mentioning that he did it with a gun.

Shouldn't there be a good web site contains gems of biased reporting?
A quick Google search did not turn it up. Looks like most pages about
biased reporting have their own axes to grind...


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 04:14:09 PST