From: Mark Day (mday@sightpath.com)
Date: Sun Jan 09 2000 - 06:10:38 PST
> [By the way, the whole concept of "reverse merger" is a weird one, as
> pointed out by the second article below. It could be as innocuous as
> not wanting to do IPO road shows, or as insidious as having something
> significant to hide, and investors will not know if it's one or the
> other until after the stock has risen 1000% or dropped 90%... or both...]
I'd be happy to learn of counterexamples, but so far every time I've seen a
reverse merger into a shell corporation, it's been someone with something
significant to hide.
--Mark
Mark Day
Senior Scientist
SightPath
+1 (781) 663-8310
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 19 2000 - 15:03:04 PST