From: Steven M. Bellovin (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Mar 04 2000 - 12:37:25 PST
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, David Honig writ
> What really concerns me is that their business model
> trashes the Everyone's-a-Publisher potential of the net.
> Maybe there is unlimited free web space out there today, but its
> not under your control, and it limits what you can do (eg.,
> CGIs, freedom of expression, etc.)
> Well lets see, the cable/dsl ISPs own the equiptment on both ends of the
> last mile.. what physics and the FCC don't constrain it seems that they do.
As I said, there is physical reality involved, not the business model. I
hadn't wanted to post a detailed expanation on something that's mostly
A standard one-way cable system is set up as a tree. There's fiber from the
head end to "fiber nodes". (For all practical purposes, bandwidth on the
fiber is unlimited.) From the fiber node, there are many lengths of coax;
these in turn feed repeaters, which each feed several other branches of coax.
You end up with a moderately bushy setup, with (as I recall) at least three
levels of repeaters.
To convert a cable system to two-way, you don't make it into a giant CSMA/CD
Ethernet. You can't -- the distances involved are too great. Instead, every
repeater is coupled to a high-pass filter; at the same points, a repeater
pointing the other way (upstream) is coupled to a low-pass filter.
The standard TV signals continue to propagate downstream as they did before.
The old repeaters, fed by high-pass filters that allow through everything from
channel 1 and up, to about 1Ghz, carry standard TV signals. One or more
channels -- that is, one or more *TV* channels -- carry IP service downstream.
Cable modems broadcast on frequencies below channel 1; these signals feed
through the low-pass filter and are sent upstream. Eventually, they reach the
CMTS (cable modem termination system) at the fiber node; at that point, they
travel on the fiber where bandwidth is plentiful. Cable modems have to request
time slots to transmit; the CMTS knows the distance (in nanoseconds) to each
cable modem, and uses that for allocations.
If you want to add more downstream bandwidth, it's easy -- just allocate
another TV channel to the Internet instead of the Do-it-yourself Gerbil
Network. But what do you do to add more bandwidth upstream? Given the design
of the two-way cable plants, your only choice is to split the fiber nodes.
That generally calls for many more fiber nodes, and hence the replacement of a
lot of coax with fiber. Yes, it can be done, but it's expensive.
Bottom line -- there is certainly a business decision about how you allocate
your limited upstream bandwidth. But it is much more limited than downstream
bandwidth, and increasing it is much more expensive.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 04 2000 - 12:41:28 PST