From: Adam L. Beberg (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 03 2000 - 23:31:42 PDT
> I made note that the audience ( who seemed to be comprised mostly of
> Theology Majors) had more of a clue about the topic at hand than
> most of the panelists.
What strikes me about your notes is that views on the subject
haven't changed since the sci-fi of the 50's. Computers will pass us,
they will be sentient, we need to play nice, yadda yadda yadda.
The only change from a similar conference held with a similar group of
experts at any time in the last 5 decades is that now we're pushing
nanotubes instead of the fringe tech of the day.
We know what will happen, we know roughly when it will happen [far far
before 2100], we know it WILL happen. What we don't know is what we do
with all those useless biological blobs that cannot keep up. How do we,
the humans, transition to a society where those not genetically
engineered and borg'ized cannot function at all? "First world" society
can't even cope with a tiny population of homeless and the aging baby
boomers, how the heck are we going to cope with the increasing numbers
of technologically irrelevant? Will society collapse at 10% obsolescence
So when are people gonna talk about the real issues? This isn't about
"them" it's about "us", "us" is the one that can't deal with change.
[I really should finish that essay huh]
- Adam L. Beberg
The Cosm Project - http://cosm.mithral.com/
firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.iit.edu/~beberg/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 03 2000 - 23:35:56 PDT