> > Tom, we fork bits here, not barfs. Could you
> > please move this garbage to an .advocacy newsgroup
> > or ZDNN "talkback" section where it belongs?
> I am sory. I forgot some folks on the list seem to
> need validation of thier ideas before they can intergrate,
> or is that bundle, them into thier own thought space. I forgot
> that unless you spoon feed the kiddes they might barf up
> on the meaty parts. Mea Culpa.
>
> Actualy, Im not goona flamer yer buttt like a slab of ribs
> over at tenese reds,
> http://katu.citysearch.com/E/V/PDXOR/0007/22/07/
>
> instead ill be nice and offer you some advice on how youll
> never have to hear of me or my barfbits again.
> http://eng.hss.cmu.edu/fiction/the-double.txt
>
> You could join AOL where they have a Tos plan so you can get
> folks who are "nasty and mean and barfy" kicked off.
> http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/orgs/american/aol/aol-tos
>
> OR you could just filter me out. Yea, that would be better,.
> You could simply turn me off like a tap of Guinnes in an AA
> meeting.
> http://www.junkbusters.com/
>
> OR Oh i dont know, you could maybe realize that somefolks
> have thoughts and opinons on subjects that are not classifed
> away to some predefined pidgeon hole or supported by a
> reffernce list.
It's not thoughts or opinions that are pidgeonholed
to .advocacy groups or zdnn "talkback" sections; it's the
vacuous delivery (ie, "In legal terms: BLOW ME"; "you want
socialistic reforms go peddle it to...well wher ever
they still do that") etc. If you're going to write, make
it worth reading, nu?
I didn't say anything about spattering gratuitous URLs
<http://www.geocities.com/~rworne/>
across your posts either, but your rebuttal sent
me RoTFL anyway. Very cute sendup of Adam's posts.
Charles
(...what do you get when you mess with the I Find Karma Police?)