Cynthia J. Dale
Technical Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.
fnord.
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, David Crook wrote:
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 11:26:51 -0800
> From: David Crook <dcrook@commwerks.com>
> To: Jesse <jesse@fsck.com>, Balachander Krishnamurthy <bala@research.att.com>
> Cc: fork@xent.com
> Subject: Re: ee.soap.old.info.non-std
>
> Besides, we all know that MS will have a proprietary MS-SOAP+ version when
> they release windows 200X. I'm sure they will be happy to embrace and
> extend their own standards as well as other peoples.
>
> Dave
>
> At 02:13 PM 11/30/99 -0500, Jesse wrote:
> >There is _nothing wrong_ with publishing one's protocols as informational
> >RFCs. Would you rather that they not publish at all?
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 01:56:01PM -0500, Balachander Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >>
> >> evil empire has only 3 of 5 people on SOAP draft submitted mid-sept (not
> new)
> >> and it is meant to be informational rfc, not in standards track which
> >> just means that ee wants to cover itself with ietf window dressing
> >> rather than co-operating/standardizing.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> bala
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >jesse reed vincent -- jrvincent@wesleyan.edu -- jesse@fsck.com
> >pgp keyprint: 50 41 9C 03 D0 BC BC C8 2C B9 77 26 6F E1 EB 91
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >Emacs is a pretty good operating system, but Unix has a better editor.
> >
> ---
> David Crook - davec@commwerks.com
> CommWerks - Industrial Strength Internet Solutions
>