From: Kent Spaulding (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 14:53:21 PDT
oops - <em>sorry</em> about that... darn defaults.
Eugene Leitl wrote:
> What is the canonical procedure of dealing with offenders FoRKing
> uncouth HTML: slow evisceration or simple impalement?
> Kent Spaulding writes:
> > <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
> > <html>
> > Somewhere, covered somewhere on the web, there is a study that evolved
> > a picture of a woman, based on input like this, until they found the western
> > ideal of a '10'.
> > <p>Find that picture, post it, seem what happens.
> > <p>Btw - Ali is darn close to this ideal chica.
> > <p>Robert Harley wrote:
> > <blockquote TYPE=CITE>Well my gorgeous wife has you all beat with 4.2:
> > <br> <a href="http://www.AmIHOTorNOT.com/r/?id=3656&key=WJXMK">http://www.AmIHOTorNOT.com/r/?id=3656&key=WJXMK>
> > <p>There must be some bug in their scripts though 'cause she's clearly
> > a 10.
> > <p>What I want to know is why the silly dancing stickman I submitted
> > <br>scored higher than almost everyone, until it got nuked by the admins:
> > <br> <a href="http://www.AmIHOTorNOT.com/r/?id=3083&key=GQNWW">http://www.AmIHOTorNOT.com/r/?id=3083&key=GQNWW>
> > <p>I say "almost" because this nekkid babe with T & A on display scored
> > almost 8:
> > <br> <a href="http://www.geocities.com/granty01/ali.jpg">http://www.geocities.com/granty01/ali.jpg>
> > <p>Wrob.</blockquote>
> > </html>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 16 2000 - 14:55:46 PDT