From: James Hong (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:19:26 PDT
So which methodology is more accurate, do you suppose? The study or the
----- Original Message -----
From: "JTS - MCDLXXXVI" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Danny O'Brien" <email@example.com>
Cc: "Kent Spaulding" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "Robert Harley"
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: Am I HOT or NOT?
> I hate to break it to such an elite bunch, but someone beat us to it.
> When Rohit first brought this to our attention, Miss Average showed up in
> my random clicking at first visit. Same grainy photo, which led me to
> suspect she was the "synthuberbabe". As I recall, she was only scoring
> about a 6 at the time.
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Danny O'Brien wrote:
> > http://www.AmIHOTorNOT.com/r/?id=4640&key=GWTJG
> > login: missaverage
> > pw: f0rk
> > (taken from http://www-psych.nmsu.edu/~vic/faceprints/female_study.html
> > I'm not sure how to factor in the godawful dithering, tho.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 17 2000 - 08:27:24 PDT