From: Sophie Maddox (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 20:03:41 PDT
--- In email@example.com, Grlygrl201@a... wrote:
> where i come from, an observation is not a potshot.
> (this discussion never had a chance; seeing the author "observed"
> should have clued me in.)
um...haven't you contradicted yourself? Are there rules on
observations. I see it as an observation being an opinion, comment
thought and how dull if all observations were the same. I think the
"observing" author had some perceptual insights.
As Aldous Huxley said, "Facts do not cease to exist because they are
ignored." That's my note on this observation.
> not pursuing this here,
Why not? Didn't you post the article here. I mean isn't it better to
debate a question without settling it than to settle a question
without debating it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 24 2000 - 20:09:27 PDT