From: Damien Morton (Morton@dennisinter.com)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 23:06:18 PST
> From: Jeff Bone [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> From CNN last night, synopsis, talking about legal precedent for
> judicial discovery of voter intent in elections:
> County in South Dakota. (?) Close election. Thrown to judge. Judge
> examines 2 ballots under 40x microscopy to determine intent of
> voter. Based on a pregnant chad, judge decides the election: it's a
> tie. Election is determined by candidates playing a game of poker.
> GOP candidate wins --- with a pair of 10s.
> I think that's how we ought to do this one.
> What a spectacle.
No way - Its a duel; sledgehammers at the deep end of a swimming pool.
Either that or into the octagon with them. Two men enter, one man leaves.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 17 2000 - 23:14:43 PST