Re: confederacy of dunces*

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jeff Bone (
Date: Mon Nov 27 2000 - 11:01:44 PST wrote:

> In a message dated 11/26/00 9:17:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> writes:
> << I agree that Gore shouldn't be trying to get all the absentee
> ballots thrown out, but the fact that some of the ballots were not filled
> out by the voters themselves, but by other people who recieved the ballots
> makes me a bit suspicious too. >>
> boner buns,

Uh, geege, that's cdale making that comment. Unless you're trying to claim
something about her vis-a-vis me... :-/

> the problem with the absentee ballots is validating when and by
> whom the votes were cast. you need a postmark, a signature and the
> signature of a witness. do you believe any of these things should be
> overlooked just because they are military?

Well... yes.

> (anybody else think greenfield and woodruff are having an affair?)

Oh yeah!


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 27 2000 - 11:07:11 PST