From: Lisa Dusseault (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Nov 29 2000 - 07:49:31 PST
That's not what I said. Gore offered (at least rhetorically) a statewide
recount, which might have resulted in more votes for Gore even with no foul
play, and even with _no_ selection of counties.
The systematic bias against Gore, if it exists, is most likely because the
crappy voting machines predominate in Democratic counties.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Bone [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 1:15 AM
> To: Lisa Dusseault
> Cc: Fork
> Subject: Re: confederacy of dunces*
> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> > Not that I believe in this, but I can think of several reasons
> why a hand
> > recount that includes more discrimating (yet still unbiased)
> judgement might
> > favour Gore.
> Well, of course this is the case. A hand recount with "fair"
> human judgement
> --- but picked in subareas that demographically favor Gore ---
> will *of course*
> favor Gore.
> That's the point.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 29 2000 - 07:53:35 PST