New, fundamental Intel Pentium flaw?
Robert S. Thau (email@example.com)
Mon, 10 Nov 1997 17:16:12 -0500 (EST)
Rohit Khare writes:
> This is bad C code, but that's NO excuse for it to crash out a chip.
> This *can't* have been in there all along, could it? Shit!
BTW, as a footnote, the following C code not only exhibits the same
but also gets past gcc -ansi -pedantic, making it arguably "good