From: Dave Winer (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 21:16:24 PDT
**Leaping into the abyss**
OK, cool then you'll probably like this part:
"The articles in the rest of this magazine, which I have not seen, probably
make XML seem very complicated. But it is not complicated. You can ignore
most of what they tell you about schemas and namespaces and parsers and
whatever. It's meaningless. If it ever gets widely deployed, the details
will be hidden behind middleware interfaces, because basically it is only
comprehensible to a very small number of people who care."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Humphries" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Dave Winer" <email@example.com>; <FoRK@xent.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: My XML Magazine article
> At 6:45 PM -0700 9/12/00, Dave Winer wrote:
> >I've published my first in-print article about XML!
> Good. All this stuff about family was bringing me down, being that the guy
in the next cube over's marriage is imploding.
> We can get back to arguing about Namespaces and RSS instead all these
intangibles about marriage and kids. :-)
> -- Bill
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 12 2000 - 21:25:56 PDT