From: Stephen D. Williams (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Sep 17 2000 - 12:22:06 PDT
Kragen Sitaker wrote:
> > PS: I see this as exactly analogous to the debate in music between
> > artists and the industry. The artists should define the industry, not
> > the other way around, of course, imho.
> I don't know if I agree. I think the fans should define the whole
> thing, not the artists or the record companies. That's what
> open-source software is about: software distributed on terms favorable
> to the users, not just the creators. Terms that make the users
> members, not just consumers.
In particular, terms that allow and encourage 'members' to join in further
This is the basic difference in philosophy: are there few 'professional'
creators or is everyone potentially a creator at one level and for desired
topics. The later model is obviously more appealing to those not currently
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/>
> Perilous to all of us are the devices of an art deeper than we ourselves
> -- Gandalf the Grey [J.R.R. Tolkien, "Lord of the Rings"]
-- Insta.com - Revolutionary E-Business Communication email@example.com Stephen D. Williams Senior Consultant/Architect http://sdw.st 43392 Wayside Cir,Ashburn,VA 20147-4622 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax Jan2000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 17 2000 - 12:27:15 PDT