From: Jeff Bone (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 15:08:06 PDT
"Zhang, Yangkun" wrote:
> What's wrong with Bush? I'm convinced that if we elect him--he'll probably
> just sit in the White House and do nothing--which is a lot better than
> having someone in there to screw things up. All I want is a president who
> sits on his ass, screws the intern, and not bomb another country when others
> find out--is that too much to ask?
Actually, that's ideal. Unf., I fear that Bush is the old cold warriors' and
right wing's designated golden boy, I imagine that they're all going to run
roughshod over him, pushing ahead policies and agendas that I don't agree with.
> I'd vote Libertarian
> (Listen to this Talk of the Nation interview w/ Harry Browne)
> but then I'd be throwing away my vote.
There's no such thing.
> Better to make sure Gore does NOT get
> into office. The last thing we need is a nationalized health care system, a
> nationalized pharmaceutical industry, more unions who impede progress, and
> lawyers who sues companies the minute their quarterly earnings comes out
> being one cent short!
Were we separated at birth?
> Bush may not be smart, but Cheney's performance as the head of HAL is
> commendable--especially keeping the stock afloat in 1999 during the oil
I just don't trust the guy.
> As for Nader--he's a damned lawyer, and an ANTI-CONSUMER one at that. I'm
> still pissed at him over screwing Prop 103--re: auto insurance reform.
Yeah, fuck Nader. What a prick. It great to be all pro-environment and all,
but jesus, why would anyone even with green leanings actually vote for that
> As for Buchanan--um... the word fascist comes to mind...
Yeah, but would the trains run on time? ;-)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 15:05:52 PDT