<< PS The testimony was to provide evidence of pattern in a sexual harassment
suit (the law which backed it up, ironically, this President signed into
being). It appears that you and a lot of other people get hung up on the sex
issue; it's just evidence. If the President had been accused of any other
malfeasance you would most likely not question his obligation to answer the
question truthfully.
G
In a message dated 98-09-12 18:59:52 EDT, you write:
<< If you can be forced to talk under oath about your private, perfectly
legal sexual activities... then THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS ALREADY UNRAVELED!
Get it?
>>
In what universe does the testifier decide what's appropriate to ask? The
judge allowed the question.
Get it?
Geege >>