<< PS The testimony was to provide evidence of pattern in a sexual harassment
suit (the law which backed it up, ironically, this President signed into
being). It appears that you and a lot of other people get hung up on the sex
issue; it's just evidence. If the President had been accused of any other
malfeasance you would most likely not question his obligation to answer the
In a message dated 98-09-12 18:59:52 EDT, you write:
<< If you can be forced to talk under oath about your private, perfectly
legal sexual activities... then THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS ALREADY UNRAVELED!
In what universe does the testifier decide what's appropriate to ask? The
judge allowed the question.