Re: Number ninteen
Thu, 09 Sep 1999 19:13:42 -0400
Rohit Khare wrote:
> pages or sites? I see they meant pages, but pages han have
> pathologically long hypertext link chains; but this is a very
> optimistic result for sites... implies that we do need automation,
> certainly, but "munchkin routing", or "source-routed UUCP" could
> scale to Web size within 20 hops... RK
> Also, these physicists should punch in the pages they did find into
> the top 5 search engines to classify how much reach *they* have --
> i.e. the "real" web has radius 19, but foo.com only searches out 12
> links, on average...
Good point. The article I read notes that typical search engines grab
only 34% of the web.
01000011 01101111 01001101 01000101 01110100
"Advocating consensual mindf*cks since 1971."