OK, you're excused. Just don't do it again.
> Half remembered facts yes, its been a few years since I've been to
> The jist of what I was saying is true.
No, the gist of what you said was junk. Sorry. And having been to Vietnam
doesn't mean that you're right about this stuff.
> The Bible did effect the development
> of another language, which was the point being made before you decided to
> show use how clever you are in the use of search engines and picking of
If you had only said that the Bible affected the development of Vietnamese,
I would have had no objection. But you had to throw in some bogus history
and bogus linguistics as well. So who's trying to impress whom?