Re: RFC 2083 on PNG: Portable Network Graphics
Thu, 16 Jan 1997 20:15:25 -0800
>> Is anybody working on a multiple graphic versions (i.e., supporting
>> animation) of PNG? It seems like nobody will drop GIF and adopt PNG
>> until it can offer the same functionality of animated GIFs.
>Yes. There's an article in the Winter 1997 Web Journal on MNG, a
>multiple-image format intended for animation support. Should hit the
>shelves any minute now: http://www.ora.com/info/wj
Ok, color me stoopid, but if it ain't broke don't fix it. Now we are going
to have PNG, MNG, and soon WTFNG. Other than the royality attached to using
Gif, why are we trying to hard to replace it?
I got two turntables and a microphone...
<> firstname.lastname@example.org <>