Why "loss of productivity" is NOT an issue

CDale cdale@techmonkeys.net
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:31:53 -0500 (CDT)

I consider myself to be a responsible smoker.  By that, I mean that I
don't smoke in other people's houses who do not smoke, nor in places where
smoking is not allowed, nor around other people's children.  I
also do not flick my butts out the window, or outside anywhere,
hoping to keep all the mangled animals near the dump.  However, were
we in a bar where smoking were allowed, and were you to be in my face with
your attitude, I would most certainly blow my smoke right in your face.

On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tom wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Tom wrote:
> --]We are all responisble for not intrusing on others.
> Ok let me clearifiythis before the trained monkey dances all over it.
> For substances and spplications where intrusion is non filterable or where
> intrusion is pushed on to other parties it is a good thing to make sure
> your not shlopping your spew onto others.
> This is not censorship, nor is it even a side cousing to
> pmrc/antipron/senateors for children/etc etc jibber jabber. That is all
> about filterable media and substances that are illicited to gian
> expousure.
> Smoke wafting to my nose is neither solicited nor easily filterable in a
> real wworld environment.
> In case your still not hip to the think, replace  the words "cigerte
> smoke" with "mustard gas" and see if your still down wit it.
> -tom"excuse me is this your smoke(stuffing it back into your lungs)"whore
> http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork

"We apologize for the inconvenience."
Marvin says, "I think I feel good about it."
The lights went out in his eyes for absolutely the very last time ever."
--Douglas Adams (1951-2001)