Re[3]: Why "loss of productivity" is NOT an issue

Joseph S. Barrera III joe@barrera.org
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:32:36 -0700


Won't smoking a joint count as

1. Smoking, and
2. Pot usage/posession/whatever?

How can that be cheaper?

Unless you're saying cheaper per enjoyment value :-)

- Joe (coding and drinking... dangerous combination... but my meds aren't 
working these days...)

We watched her fall over and lay down
Shouting the poetic truths of high school journal keepers - SY


>for each of you, so if you want to take the risk, I will too."  We smoked
>a cig, and thought about it for a few minutes, then put the cigs away and
>lit up a joint.  It was a cheaper risk.  God, I love California.  (:
>C