Re[3]: Why "loss of productivity" is NOT an issue
Joseph S. Barrera III
joe@barrera.org
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 18:32:36 -0700
Won't smoking a joint count as
1. Smoking, and
2. Pot usage/posession/whatever?
How can that be cheaper?
Unless you're saying cheaper per enjoyment value :-)
- Joe (coding and drinking... dangerous combination... but my meds aren't
working these days...)
We watched her fall over and lay down
Shouting the poetic truths of high school journal keepers - SY
>for each of you, so if you want to take the risk, I will too." We smoked
>a cig, and thought about it for a few minutes, then put the cigs away and
>lit up a joint. It was a cheaper risk. God, I love California. (:
>C