Re: Why "loss of productivity" is NOT an issue
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 20:38:58 -0500 (CDT)
Nope. I think it's a $50 fine for possession, and the law about smoking
in bars specifies tobacco as the prohibitted substance. Or so the
bartender told us. (:
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Joseph S. Barrera III wrote:
> Won't smoking a joint count as
> 1. Smoking, and
> 2. Pot usage/posession/whatever?
> How can that be cheaper?
> Unless you're saying cheaper per enjoyment value :-)
> - Joe (coding and drinking... dangerous combination... but my meds aren't
> working these days...)
> We watched her fall over and lay down
> Shouting the poetic truths of high school journal keepers - SY
> >for each of you, so if you want to take the risk, I will too." We smoked
> >a cig, and thought about it for a few minutes, then put the cigs away and
> >lit up a joint. It was a cheaper risk. God, I love California. (:
"We apologize for the inconvenience."
Marvin says, "I think I feel good about it."
The lights went out in his eyes for absolutely the very last time ever."
--Douglas Adams (1951-2001)