Why "loss of productivity" is NOT an issue
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 22:44:50 -0500
Joe, I'm sure I agree with you, but whatever do you mean?
"Joseph S. Barrera III" wrote:
> Won't smoking a joint count as
> 1. Smoking, and
> 2. Pot usage/posession/whatever?
> How can that be cheaper?
> Unless you're saying cheaper per enjoyment value :-)
> - Joe (coding and drinking... dangerous combination... but my meds aren't
> working these days...)
> We watched her fall over and lay down
> Shouting the poetic truths of high school journal keepers - SY
> >for each of you, so if you want to take the risk, I will too." We smoked
> >a cig, and thought about it for a few minutes, then put the cigs away and
> >lit up a joint. It was a cheaper risk. God, I love California. (: