REST, RPC, mountains, molehills, and a retraction (sort of)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Thu, 9 Aug 2001 09:23:24 -0700

Yes but presumably it is the type of the message(s) and not the name of
the resource identifier that gives the semantics of the interaction.


>URIs are opaque to software, not to people.  People associate=20
>meaning to labels of all kinds, including URIs.
>If you don't believe me, then would you mind registering=20
> and moving your home page there? 8-)