REST: everything old is new again?

Sateesh Narahari narahari@hotmail.com
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:49:47 -0600


I would be interested in reading your essay. But, I would argue design level 
reuse is always better.

As Dave Winer put it rightly:
"
I am in favor of higher level abstractions.
I do it all the time, that's what being a programmer is about."


Sateesh


>From: Jeff Bone <jbone@jump.net>
>To: Sateesh Narahari <narahari@hotmail.com>
>CC: fork@xent.com
>Subject: Re: REST: everything old is new again?
>Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:31:30 -0500
>
>
>
>Sateesh Narahari wrote:
>
> > contrary to the popular internet myth that OO reuse is not happening, 
>its
> > actually happening.
> >
> > If we don't get bogged down in thinking reuse only applies to code, then
> > reusability is being achieved in OO world thru cataloging of Design
> > Patterns.
> >
> > Its not code-reuse, but its reuse, and its highly useful.
>
>Yup, and I think that's hilarious. :-)  I've been picking at an essay 
>called
>"Reuse Reconsidered" for a few days now, and maybe I'll finish it 
>thisevening
>if the creek doesn't flood my house.  (We're having torrential rains, 
>here.)
>But one of the things mentioned in it is that after slicing-and-dicing 
>reuse
>in N ways, the OO community just threw up its hands and said "forget 
>reusing
>artifacts, we'll just reuse design and that's good enough."
>
>I don't think that's the best we can do, though.  Both the UNIX software 
>tools
>philosophy and the Web itself represent reuse on a MUCH grander and more
>practical scale than has ever been achieved by OO techniques.
>
>I'm thinking maybe there's a lesson there...
>
>jb
>
>
>
>
>http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp