Is FoRK the world's most perverse mailing list?
Sun, 02 Dec 2001 14:18:16 +0000
Chris Olds wrote:
> As to the question posed, I'd have to say it's a contender.
> As to the _reason_ proposed, I don't think so. I think the argument is
> best put at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html (full text
> posted to the archives, for posterity).
Persuasive. So basically I'm just a lazy git who can't make the effort
to remember to reply to all when I'm forking. Makes sense to me ;-)
> Mailman is doing a good job, and I expect that if reply-to munging was the
> common order of things, it would be on by default. It wasn't so long ago
> that FoRK was a sendmail alias - things are great now, by comparison!
Yes, I do remember those dark times.
Andy Armstrong, Tagish