Privacy and public spaces (was: Complacency)
Russell Turpin
deafbox@hotmail.com
Wed, 4 Jul 2001 11:33:30 -0500
The downside to this technology is that association
is no longer private. Everyone with the dime to
pay for a report will know your political, religious,
social, and sexual associations. Or the question
can be asked the other way around. Who are all
the people who attend church X? Who are all the
people who attended meetings for cause Y? Who
are all the people who were seen having dinner
with Z?
In the past, it was possible to hire detectives to
answer this kind of question. But (a) this was
expensive, (b) detailed itineraries were especially
expensive, and had to be requested before the
fact, and (c) there were ways to protect against
this, if groups or individuals so desired. If city
street cameras become common and their
images archived .. well, that will be an interesting
change.
Russell