XP is slower than Win2K

Wed, 31 Oct 2001 13:25:56 -0800

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C1620F.92B65960
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Infoworld article: Waiting for Windows XP by P.J. Connolly and Randall C.
Kennedy. Details a test where an Office XP exerciser script was run on
multiple PC configurations. The test suite ran slower on XP that W2000 in
all cases. New and improved, only slower.

- Jim

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C1620F.92B65960
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.3207.2500" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Infoworld article: <A=20
href=3D"http://www2.infoworld.com/articles/tc/xml/01/10/29/011029tcwinxp.=
xml?Template=3D/storypages/printfriendly.html">Waiting=20
for Windows XP</A>&nbsp;by P.J. Connolly and Randall C. Kennedy. Details =
a test=20
where an Office XP exerciser script was run on multiple PC =
configurations. The=20
test suite ran slower on XP that W2000 in all cases. New and improved, =
only=20
slower.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>- Jim</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C1620F.92B65960--