Enron solution

John Hall johnhall@evergo.net
Sat, 26 Jan 2002 10:16:41 -0800

No, if you want a real conspiracy you say "Maybe someone didn't want him to
talk and arranged the suicide ...".

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam L. Beberg [mailto:beberg@mithral.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:21 AM
To: John Hall
Cc: fork@xent.com
Subject: RE: Enron solution

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, John Hall wrote:

> To Adam: He wasn't an ex-head.  He was an ex-high up.  Further, I thought
> was about the only one that resigned early (like last March) in protest.
> least I thought the 'whistle blower' letter mentioned him.

Oh please, facts have no place in the legal system. He Darwin'd and
volunteered to be scapegoat, end of story.

> But if you want a conspiracy, then why was *this* person the one who blew
> his head off?  (See note to Adam).  It seems a bit curious.

He wouldn't unless he knew he was gonna be in deep trouble now would he?

- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg