[Fwd: "Adopt Your MP": Good job.]
Andy Armstrong
andy@tagish.com
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 00:02:48 +0100
I think Danny's on FoRK, but I think other Forkers will, indeed should,
find this interesting and he'll probably be too modest to post it here.
http://www.stand.org.uk/
Danny O'Brien wrote:
>
> GOVERNMENT NO LONGER QUITE SO KEEN ON RIP STANDING ORDER
>
> As most of you will already have heard, the government has backed down from
> the RIP s22 Order that would have given access to traffic data to dozens of
> government departments. We thought you'd like to know that this U-turn was
> largely down to you.
>
> The FaxYourMP folk say that they relayed 1789 faxes from last monday, and
> estimate that around 1600 of those were related to the s22 RIP Order. That
> means that, on average, every MP received at least two messages expressing
> concern over the measure.
>
> We've received mail from constituents saying that their Member of Parliament
> called them directly to discuss the issue. We've had MPs mail us with
> advice. We've had TV companies and newspapers contact us after they'd been
> hassled by their readers and viewers. We've even had MPs writing letters to
> constituents explaining, mournfully, that there was nothing they could do -
> and then had their own voters explain to them how to attend Standing
> Committee debates, and who to get in contact with others to help fight this
> order. Ah, those apathetic votees.
>
> Also, we had Hugh.
>
> One of the stories we've repeatedly heard is that the Home Secretary's
> change of heart came from a briefing by his 21-year old son, Hugh Blunkett.
>
> Hugh, like the rest of us, uses the Internet. He knows enough to see how
> dangerous this proposition was. At some point - whether it was a forwarded
> messaage, or an announcement posted on http://slashdot.org, or a link on
> your Website - Hugh found out about this order. He read the comments, and
> the objections posted by thousands of people online, and did something about
> it.
>
> Now, of course, it does help if your dad is the Home Secretary. But if
> there's one thing we've learnt from STAND, it's that people have greater
> access to the levers of government than they think. From you to the Home
> Secretary is a very short chain, and for practical purposes, we don't care
> whether it was via Hugh or David's old classmate at Huddersfield College.
> Someone explained to him how the rest of us feel.
>
> Making contact is important. The volunteers at STAND and FaxYourMP are
> almost pathologically cynical, but we're regularly taken aback by how
> positively MPs, editors, civil servants and peers of the realm respond to a
> personal contact by intelligent and reasonable citizens. It's almost as if
> they're flattered by the attention. It's almost as if they're touched anyone
> even cares about what they do.
>
> At the beginning of this campaign - oh, almost a week ago now - many people
> (from professional lobbyists to anonymous Web forum posters) told us that it
> was futile to encourage others to make a fuss. It was too late; that
> delegated legislation would be railroaded through; that no-one cared about
> privacy issues; that U-turns never happen.
>
> Well, perhaps we shouldn't get too cocky. Even this proposal has only been
> "postponed indefinitely", possibly only until the next Parliament after the
> Summer break. And there are dozens of other bits of legislation hanging
> about with vast technological idiocies contained within
> - the RIP Act draft Code of Practices; the EU's Copyright Directive and Data
> Retention orders; laws against reverse-engineering; software patents and who
> knows what else.
>
> But we thought it was worth saying that you won. And the next time you're
> talking to someone about these issues, and someone says "what's the point?"
> - well, you now may now point at yourself, and mention how you got the
> government to blink.
>
> Cheers,
>
> The STAND team.
>
> PS The News At Ten people broadcast a segment about STAND member's
> effect on on Tuesday night. If it's before 1330pm on Wednesday when
> you read this (and you have Real player), you can watch it here:
> <URL:http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsa/n5ctrl/tvseq/news_ost.ram>
>
> Many of the wine bottles behind James are now empty.
--
Andy Armstrong, http://www.tagish.co.uk/