MS Exchange lies about encryption

[Bill Kearney]

But I'm sure MS is positively loving all this free software testing they're
getting from all the hacking efforts!

I'm curious, with all this ranting about MS, is anyone actually taking the time
to look into what they've actually implemented?  Some of the work they've done
in Kerberos, LDAP, PKI and the like is a lot less worse than you might think.
They're certainly a lot easier to implement than some of the flaming hoops you
need to negotiate on other platforms.  Sure, there's plenty of embrace and
extend to be concerned about.  But, seriously, who's doing it better?  Or even
just less-worse?

-Bill Kearney