Anti-war train drivers refuse to move arms freight
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:12:15 -0500
OK, Mr. Hall, when are you reporting to your recruiting center? You talk
very tough sitting behind your keyboard. When are you heading to Iraq?
C'mon, times a-wasting, we're shipping out now!
>From: "johnhall" <email@example.com>
>To: "'FoRK'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: RE: Anti-war train drivers refuse to move arms freight
>Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:48:54 -0800
>Only if they were captured in Afghanistan without wearing a uniform and
>holding an AK-47.
>Of course the traditional solution to that problem (of such illegal
>combatants), is to hang such people immediately. (You hang them, not
>shoot them, shooting is for honorable enemies). Locking them up instead
>is a military decision probably justified by the facts on the ground in
>Afghanistan. (You would rather they surrender quickly).
>These [train] folks were not illegal combatants, just immoral and
>stupid. Firing is sufficient. Had the shooting already started then
>you probably have grounds for a Treason charge.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of
> > Robert Harley
> > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:30 PM
> > To: email@example.com
> > Subject: Re: Anti-war train drivers refuse to move arms freight
> > John Hall wrote:
> > >Simple solution.
> > >Fire them. Make sure they never operate a train again.
> > Surely it would be more "a la mode" for Tony Blair to tell the
> > military to lock them up for a few years without trial?
> > R
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.