[FoRK] [External] : Re: Is this a dumb question?
aaron at bavariati.org
Thu Mar 18 08:22:27 PDT 2021
Add physical cryptographic tokens and you have .mil or eop.gov
On 2021-03-18 06:58, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
> I'm guessing it'd be verticalized task specific access rather than
> geographic. As there would be so many of them, there'd be no reason
> to only think of access at the big granular level.
> Different virtualinterwebs could have different terms of service for
> using them including use and types of software, apps, content, QoS,
> etc. If you don't obey the ToS then your next little emphemeral,
> contemporaneously generated crypto access is not renewed.
> On 3/10/2021 9:48 PM, Reza B'Far wrote:
>> Interesting... so, how would that work in practice from Nation/State
>> sponsored attacks? As in where would you restrict things? You would
>> restrict, say *.cn?
>> I like Network/Hardware solutions over software solutions because they
>> erect physical barriers that have a much higher cost. Bunch of dudes
>> a basement can't access satellites or subterranean cables (well, not
>> easily and at low cost). I think you could really fight things like
>> IP-theft which seem to be a big focus of the recent attacks by just
>> "cutting off" the hose.
>> On 3/10/21 3:45 PM, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
>>> I like the idea of having a gTLD that you can only get on with
>>> time based, ephemeral certificates.
>>> On 3/8/2021 11:21 AM, Reza B'Far wrote:
>>>> Reading the details of the Chinese attack... and the Russian
>>>> Why would the western world not just go to a model where bit hoses
>>>> internet are closed to those countries? I mean, I understand there
>>>> really no effective way of "cutting off" networks globally... but
>>>> are ways to basically restrict bandwidth and that would really
>>>> problems for those countries. Why would we not do that? Like why
>>>> NATO for example have a wing that can just limit the bandwidth to a
>>>> point where it becomes very "expensive" to mount large attacks?
>>>> FoRK mailing list
>>> FoRK mailing list
>> FoRK mailing list
> FoRK mailing list
More information about the FoRK