[FoRK] Re: identity-based encryption
list at waterken.net
Tue Feb 10 22:01:50 PST 2004
On Tue February 10 2004 09:59 am, Gregory Alan Bolcer wrote:
> Proof by contradiction?
> 0) Digital certificates provide no actual security for e-commerce
> 1) Shared, pre-installed Digital certificates provide channel encryption.
> 2) Most e-commerce information is transferred across and encrypted channel
> 2) Channel encryption is not equal to "no security"
> QED. :-)
If you ate a peanut butter sandwich while establishing your
channel encryption, would that mean that peanut butter sandwiches
provide e-commerce security?
> The term "next to no" would be more appropriate. Also,
> just to pipe in, I think the failure of PKI has more to do
> with no client apps (ESPECIALLY networked client
> apps) were easily integrated with it more than
> the namespace (which did contribute to the failure, but only
> a small percentage).
Having trouble parsing this.
The union of REST and capability-based security.
More information about the FoRK