[FoRK] Scalability of intelligence
eugen at leitl.org
Thu Aug 5 02:46:48 PDT 2004
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:29:45PM -0700, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
> Things like human language seem to be around a=24 level algorithm
It doesn't require intelligence to increase intelligence. Darwinian evolution
isn't an intelligent process, yet it produced us. Of course, given hints like
it should be possible to figure out the architecture of the neuroanatomy, and
> I should add that I generally do not believe a genuine "hard take-off"
> is possible in the absence of proper general purpose MNT, and I think
You don't need general purpose MNT, only means of fabbing molecular
electronics in bulk cheaply enough to prototype in low submegabuck range
(preferrably, a lot cheaper, as it increases the number of hardware
Current fabs would do, if there was enough money to burn on building
WSI-scale cellular architectures, including an interwafer mesh
> it currently looks like we'll have general purpose AI before we have
> general purpose MNT (obviously arguable).
If you have enough crunch to do human-grade AI, letting them figuring out machine-phase
chemistry, viable self-rep designs and a bootstrap route largely in machina
is very small beer in comparison.
People could do it with today's technology, but it would be a very
large-scale effort, and take several decades.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lair.xent.com/pipermail/fork/attachments/20040805/c826c938/attachment.pgp
More information about the FoRK