[FoRK] [Fwd: WinFS' Spot on Back Burner Nothing New]
eugen at leitl.org
Thu Sep 9 01:27:36 PDT 2004
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 07:03:18PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> yep. TBH I was expecting this to happen this time around anyway ;) I'm
> not convinced that the filesystem should be, or wins by being, a database
> at all. Now, having said that, Reiserfs' efficiency for small metadata
> "forks" seems cool though.
CPU load is considerably higher, though. No good FS for CPU-intensive tasks.
It's probably a good idea to move a CPU into hard drives anyway -- though it
will need a different interconnect -- especially given that future storage is
solid-state and hence low-latency.
What good are file systems for MRAM-based solid-state machines anyway? OO/GC
is good enough for that.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lair.xent.com/pipermail/fork/attachments/20040909/d73dd29f/attachment.pgp
More information about the FoRK