[FoRK] portals vs time
eugen at leitl.org
Fri Feb 4 03:10:18 PST 2005
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 12:17:04AM +0000, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
> Hmm, I don???t see that at all. And I have VM with XEmacs, in a screen
> session, for weeks at a time.
Have you tried your setup with ~200 kmails, on a 512 kByte RAM machine?
> > I was actually flirting with the idea of getting whole hog lisp (Hemlock
> > and GCLisp), but above totally put me off.
> GC in FSF Emacs and XEmacs sucks, so that is a pity. There are much better
> Lisp implementations out there (uhh, with tail recursion actually
> implemented, for example), and it surprises me a little that someone hasn???t
> added editor functionality to one of them to give an Emacs-workalike. Given
> how, umm, focused Lisp people can be, that is.
Have you tried http://www.cons.org/cmucl/hemlock/index.html on CMUCL yet?
> > For large amounts of mail, remote 24/7/365 machine, screen/mutt rocks
> > totally. Given that I usually operate on the tail of mbox file these
> > synching writeouts typically less than one second (if you've been
> > visiting stuff far upstream it takes longer, of course, unless you've got
> > a killer storage subsystem and/or gobs of memory).
> I would certainly concede that it is probably faster; I like how trivial
> scripting things is in XEmacs, though, and I find VM + XEmacs + local hacks
> more featureful than any other mail environment I have used. (Tried mutt a
> few times, got really turned off by the keybindings. Which is a superficial
> judgement, but there you go.)
The keybindings are completely customizable. Mutt without a really long
.muttrc is a pretty lousy one.
Another thing which made Lisp a pain is that an iBook's keyboard is anything
but space cadet.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the FoRK