[FoRK] Bush's tanking approval ratings
eugen at leitl.org
Tue Apr 12 04:14:51 PDT 2005
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:32:12PM -0400, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
> The energy used in creating a vehicle probably exceeds the fuel used
> during it's lifetime. I realized a couple years ago when I almost
Given a 1994 study by VW (a decade, half a lightsecond on the tachometer, 8.1
l/100 km mileage).
6% of energy total is for the raw materials (30 times it takes to recycle it)
4% of energy used in production
~90% fuel production and use (12.150 tons fuel)
1000 kg of car over lifetime results in
36 tons CO2
413 kg CO
192 kg hydrocarbons
34 kg SO2
28 kg NOx
6 kg airborne aerosol
118 tons of contaminated water
8 tons ore byproducts
2 ton excavation
250 kg nickel and copper slag
sans fuel and water use the car generates 320 kg
materials, and equal amount of trash.
Above should still apply today -- it's probably worse due to outsourcing.
You can probably use a factor of three of above for your average SUV.
> bought a Prius that the savings in gas for a 100 mile per day commute
> were not a significant amount compared to the price of a new vehicle.
You need to do a TCO calculation, and weigh in the lack of local exhaust issue.
> If you assume 20 years of use, this may come out differently, but the
> Prius' status seemed questionable past warranty.
I'm surprised why geeks can't look up the numbers, and do ecology calculus.
It's just numbers.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the FoRK